Announcement Announcement Module
No announcement yet.
Why 2.5.6.A dependencies? Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse
Conversation Detail Module
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why 2.5.6.A dependencies?

    I know about OSGi, I know springsource is heavily pushing this technology. Still I think it is a bad decision to make BlazeDS integration dependent on this technology. Upgrading from M2 to RC1 is not easy. I am having a lot of double dependencies. All the special OSGi enabled version of external projects are a nightmare.

    I'd suggest to create a pom.xml without the osgi dependencies (2.5.6.A) and base it on the normal spring version. For now I'll try to create one of my own, tips are welcome, because I really want to start using the new features.

    ** after edit **
    I see now, that M2 also had the same dependencies, so the problem is different. I'll some more investigation. I leave the post for ideas and opinions, because I still think it was a bad idea to use these A depedencies.

    regards Jettro
    Last edited by jettro; May 9th, 2009, 04:24 PM.

  • #2
    When publishing 1.0, we will be publishing a version to the central maven repository that has no dependencies on the OSGi versions of the libraries in the SpringSource repository. I will actually be preparing that this week and will report here when I have a test version for all the maven users to try.


    • #3
      Ok, we have published Maven-central-compatible POMs with RC2.

      To use that version, you'll want to point to the Spring milestone maven repository:

          <name>Spring Portfolio Milestone Repository</name>
      and then to add the dependency:



      • #4
        Very nice, Jeremy. It is working like a charm.


        • #5
          When I switch to RC2 on the central style repo then I get the following error
          Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.xpath.CachedXPathAPI
          2009-05-21 10:39:06.615::WARN:  Nested in org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCreationException: Error creating bean with name '_messageBrokerDefaultHandlerMapping'
          I can see that the old org.springframework.flex POM brought down SpringSource's OSGi-fied Xalan but the spring-flex POM does not seem to. Is this similar to the Jackson fault where the generated POM is incomplete? Of course as a short term fix I have just added Xalan to my own POM.

          Any ideas?
          Last edited by pledge; May 21st, 2009, 05:01 AM.